The short answer is yes, of course. But then it would be called evolution. If gain of function interfered, then it is weaponization.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gain-of-function_research
The fact that Coronaviruses and its diseases would have mutated naturally in humans is not a well tilled theory.
Some argue that we might have created variants of the virus through experiments in the hopes of determining just how it can harm humans and wildlife, in a lab.
A. Fauci courtesy of Time Magazine.
But what if we humans are the Petrie dish as well as targets?
https://theveganreview.com/the-east-india-company-bans-civet-coffee/
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-sars-idUSPEK23793120061123
Courtesy Radio Canada.ca
Former CDC director Robert Redfield testified Wednesday the 8th of March 2023, that Dr. Anthony Fauci’s suppression of the Covid-19 lab-leak theory was “antithetical to science.”
Translation: Redfield thinks that Fauci lied.
Redfield quote:
“Remember this pandemic did not start in January at the seafood market — we now know that there was infections all the way back into September,” he said. “This was a narrative that was decided that they were going to say this came from the wet market and they were going to do everything they could to support it to negate any discussion of the possibility that this came from a laboratory.”
- Robert R. Redfield
The very first sentence of that statement is absolutely irresponsible and likely self-serving, here's why.
The pandemic that “never really went away.
Taubenberger poignantly reminded us that all influenza A virus strains trace their origin to the 1918 flu—”the founder virus”—and its zoonotic jump to humans was similar to that of COVID-19.
Taubenberger's laboratory was the first to sequence the genome of the influenza virus that caused the 1918 pandemic, took us through the not-so-distant history of that cataclysmic global event.
Taubenberger pointing to a book written by a German doctor in 1820 that asked essentially the same questions we are asking today: “What is influenza? Where does it come from? How did it behave in the past? How can we predict future occurrence and halt spread?”
Reality is that Dr. Redfield is haphazardly accusing Fauci's NIH of funding research to determine how SARS could develop, with very little evidence, when in fact, and I can't stress this enough, IN FACT, most of the people on the planet were likely incubated with Influenza A inadvertently, generations after generations since at least 1918.
Maybe food handlers didn't adhere to cleaning protocols, fishmongers come into focus eventually.
But you can still float the lab theory boat all you want, it could be that a lab technician- in China, was infected and walked the virus right out the door.
But there's a guy in France that was infected before lab employees got sick in Wuhan...
Was it a lab leak, or was it triggered by a combination of Tuberculosis and Influenza?
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/wuhan-lab-staff-sought-hospital-care-before-covid-19-outbreak-disclosed-wsj-2021-05-23/
One important piece of evidence is eluding reality in this theory and that is, there was no medication at that time, so how would lab employees be cured? Did they succumb from the disease?
Again, three researchers from China's Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) sought hospital care in November 2019, but as you will read below, that is roughly two months after a fishmonger in France was infected...
We do know that SARS was first discovered as having had its super spreader moment in another animal market, this one, 10 hours away from Wuhan, and 16 years before...
If we allow a degree of ascertainment bias, we will identify the only common denominator here, and that is that SARS and Covid – 19, both initiated in animal markets that were not in close proximity of each other and in different decades.
About that Frenchman:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-france-retests-idUSKBN22H15R
A 42-year-old man born in Algeria, who had lived in France for many years and worked as a fishmonger - was infected with COVID-19, two months before the first reported lab employees in Wuhan sought medical attention in China”.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/18/health/covid-wuhan-market-lab-leak.html
COVID-19 is a zoonotic disease and the natural reservoir of SARS-CoV-2 seems to be bats, but is it, exclusively?
People working in animal markets with fish makes much more sense.
Moreover, it could be implied that somehow, open air animal markets workers could be intermediate reservoirs that eventually unleashes a super spreader event.
So, is there something in some type of fish disease that triggers the super spreader events when coming in contact with human carriers of the SARS viruses?
It is reported that:
Due to Chinese eating habits and historical tradition, wild animals with access to bat populations are used as food and medicine in some regions, alerting scientists to find relevant evidence to support or oppose the possibility.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2020.580137/full
But in 2004, the scientific community knew that, yet no research was conducted to determine the impact of any diets of humans that consumed such contaminated products as Civet and Krill and interacted with, you guessed it, some kind of fish...
Just to be safe, The United States banned products containing Civet Cat and its oils since 2004.
https://www.nationalreview.com/.../antithetical-to.../
Redfield seems to ascertain that the virus might have been engineered- that's the gain of function theory.
Which statement, in of itself, almost implies that someone did it on purpose, to design a new variant and with or without ulterior and nefarious motives- actually Redfield says that he doesn't believe that any dark motivation is behind the implied designs but, that executing the experience alone should not have happened.
But can someone take advantage of primary infections in individuals and trigger diseases like Covid 19 at will thereafter?
Make no mistake, I am not saying that SARS Cov2 can be or has been weaponized, however one can no longer ignore that possibility, when just about everyone on the planet has either been expose to, or are a carrier of the Coronavirus.
Vaccines that were eventually developed and vaccination strategies that were implemented, might have mitigated the spread of diseases caused by the Corona virus, but are humans still vulnerable to other diseases caused by this influenza ?
The answer is, someone knows, and unlike Dr. Redfield they aren't dropping hints.
Since the first outbreak of SARS and MERS we have witnessed a constant improvement of transmissibility, that resulted in the disease we now call Covid 19, much akin to weapons development.
From SARS to MERS and Covid 19, there are equal amounts of development times, with MERS straddling the timeline when Covid 19 had its super spreader event.
So is Dr. Redfield threading a fine line between tanking his credibility and trying to warn people that there is more to it than meets the proverbial eye?
In the intelligence community nobody that I talk to cares about a few employees at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and, no one believe in the leak theory, literally, no one.
On the fringe however, some look at China and wonder out loud if the Communist party found a means to control population growth, that might have exceeded their expectations and aims. For that matter it could be anyone that identifies China as a climate change problem with its bulging population.
However, the premise most are working on is, well, just as bad. The dynamics are such that if investigative products in development are leaked, speculation certainly would cause worldwide panic.
The clues that are developing now, will enable us to see the forest for the trees if we are afforded the time before the next pandemic.
We have the market in Wuhan, the food handlers in Guangdong province and the fishmonger in France.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3323155/
Unless there is a lab in near proximity of all these markets, wouldn’t it make sense to look at the relationship between certain fish and the virus?
Well, the Chinese Government did, and they were ridiculed for it…
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/aug/18/city-in-china-orders-fish-swabbed-for-covid
But did Chinese officials investigate cleaning products and procedures at those markets and on these boats that they tested?
https://www.fao.org/3/x5922e/x5922e01.htm
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5371813/
Human viruses often directly and indirectly interact with bacteria. Direct interactions involve a specific bacterium or bacterial product that aids viral infection. Indirect partnerships are the result of a primary viral infection producing amenable conditions for bacterial colonization.
Is that the trigger.
A profile of the eccentricities of a potential suspect emerges at one point. Such beliefs held by the suspect would be based on distant history, a legend of sorts.
An equal interval of actions of war are required.
As such and because no pandemic repeated historically at regular intervals before and since the pandemic of 1918 until 2002, we can infer that the schedule of release of improved Coronavirus diseases is controlled, deliberate and on a schedule we might not have thought of.
Rational dictates that we prioritize intelligence and investigations in a manner whereas we first rule out weaponization, but the instant you have gain of function experiments, you need to look for someone.
Dr.Fauci and Dr. Redfield agree on one thing, Influenze A could be weaponized and likely was.
D.M. Deilgat.
No comments:
Post a Comment